- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 09:45:37 +0900
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: tkinias@optimalco.com, "'www-validator@w3.org'" <www-validator@w3.org>, www-html@w3.org
The state as discribed by Bjoern is what I understand, too.
There is a proposal to use the HTML restrictions even for
XHTML, because using something like € and thinking that
it stands for the Euro is a very frequent error.
Regards, Martin.
At 01:07 01/07/16 +0200, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
>* Martin Duerst wrote:
> >At 04:32 01/06/05 +0200, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> >>* Thanasis Kinias wrote:
> >> >The validator complains about "non-SGML character" references (e.g.,
> “
> >> >instead of the correct “) only when validating as XHTML. That
> implies
> >> >that “ and the other Microsoft characters from decimal 128-159 (hex
> >> >80-9f) _are_ valid in HTML.
> >>
> >>They are, they just refer to non-printing control characters.
>
>The other way round, valid XML, invalid HTML.
>
> > CHARSET
> > BASESET "ISO Registration Number 177//CHARSET
> > ISO/IEC 10646-1:1993 UCS-4 with
> > implementation level 3//ESC 2/5 2/15 4/6"
> > DESCSET 0 9 UNUSED
> > 9 2 9
> > 11 2 UNUSED
> > 13 1 13
> > 14 18 UNUSED
> > 32 95 32
> > 127 1 UNUSED
> > 128 32 UNUSED
> > 160 55136 160
> > 55296 2048 UNUSED -- SURROGATES --
> > 57344 1056768 57344
>
> >Actually, these code positions are valid (though rather useless)
> >in XML, but they are invalid in HTML. So I'm not sure what the
> >result is for XHTML.
>
>x'posted to www-html@w3.org. Are the as unused declared characters from
>HTML 4.0 valid in XHTML 1.0?
>--
>Bj$B‹S(Bn H$B‹I(Brmann { mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de } http://www.bjoernsworld.de
>am Badedeich 7 } Telefon: +49(0)4667/981028 { http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
>25899 Dageb$B—M(Bl { PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 } http://www.learn.to/quote/
Received on Sunday, 15 July 2001 20:46:30 UTC