- From: Tim Bagot <tsb-w3-html-0003@earth.li>
- Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2001 12:01:22 +0000 (UTC)
- To: <www-html@w3.org>
At 2001-07-07T14:14+0900, ±èÁøÃâ wrote:- > <![%Inventory.prefixed; [ > <!ENTITY % Inventory.pfx "%Inventory.prefix;:"> > ]]> > <!ENTITY % Inventory.pfx ""> > In this example, initially the value of Inventory.prefixed is assigned > for "IGNORE", so it makes sense. But, How about in the case of > "INCLUDE"??? I think the last line of this example is parsed always, > so the prefix is configured as default XML namespace in the > namespace-aware parser. Section 4.2 (Entity Declarations) of the XML Recommendation [1] says: "If the same entity is declared more than once, the first declaration encountered is binding". [1] <http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml#sec-entity-decl> Tim Bagot
Received on Saturday, 7 July 2001 08:01:27 UTC