- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 02:46:49 +0100
- To: <bertilow@chello.se>
- Cc: <www-html@w3.org>
* Bertilo Wennergren wrote: >>> > >"document.all" works perfectly in Mozilla - i.e. it does _not_ work, >>> > >and that is the correct behaviour for at standards compliant browser. > >>> > Why do you think so? > >>> Because "document.all" is not part of the standard DOM. It's a proprietary >>> MSIE thing. > >> Claiming that support of non-standard (i.e., proprietary) object >> model makes an implementation "non-standards-compliant" is incorrect. >> It is proprietary OM, but nothing the DOM claims exclusion of any other >> OM. >Bjoern however said that "document.all" does not work correctly in >Mozilla. Nope... >I should however not have written "_the_ correct behaviour" since >that implies that there is only one correct behaviour for non-standard >objects. That's why I've asked. Supporting document.all doesn't make a browser less standards-compliant. Applications using this extension are less standards-compliant. -- Björn Höhrmann ^ mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de ^ http://www.bjoernsworld.de am Badedeich 7 ° Telefon: +49(0)4667/981028 ° http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de 25899 Dagebüll # PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 # http://learn.to/quote [!]e --++~ C_.._a_.._r_.._p_.._e_.._ _.._N_.._o_.._c_.._t_.._e_.._m ~++--
Received on Tuesday, 27 February 2001 20:45:42 UTC