- From: Bertilo Wennergren <bertilow@hem.passagen.se>
- Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 21:07:57 +0100
- To: <www-html@w3.org>
Chris Wilson:
>> Bjoern Hoehrmann:
>> > * Bertilo Wennergren wrote:
>> > >> Other things that I can think of off the top of my head that
>> don't work
>> > >> correctly [in Mozilla] is that document.all stuff IE has,
>> > >"document.all" works perfectly in Mozilla - i.e. it does _not_ work,
>> > >and that is the correct behaviour for at standards compliant browser.
>> > Why do you think so?
>> Because "document.all" is not part of the standard DOM. It's a proprietary
>> MSIE thing.
> Claiming that support of non-standard (i.e., proprietary) object
> model makes an implementation "non-standards-compliant" is incorrect.
> It is proprietary OM, but nothing the DOM claims exclusion of any other
> OM.
I never said anything about any browser being "non-standards-compliant".
All I said was that it a browser that does not support "documents.all"
is behaving correctly. It might be correct to support it too.
Bjoern however said that "document.all" does not work correctly in
Mozilla. It does, since it doesn't work at all, and that is correct.
I should however not have written "_the_ correct behaviour" since
that implies that there is only one correct behaviour for non-standard
objects.
#####################################################################
Bertilo Wennergren
<http://purl.oclc.org/net/bertilo>
<bertilow@chello.se>
#####################################################################
Received on Monday, 26 February 2001 15:05:47 UTC