- From: Sean Palmer <sean_b_palmer@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2000 15:56:16 -0700 (PDT)
- To: www-html@w3.org
Hello everyone, I just thought some people may be interested in a short note that I have published, entitled "XHTML 1.0 and XHTML 1.1 as Co-existing Languages" at http://xhtml.waptechinfo.com/xhtml1and2.html To save the lazy people, I'll re-publish it here:- "It is clear that XHTML 1.1 will represent a major departure from XHTML 1.0, namely the fact that 1.1/2.0 are XML languages first and foremost, and should be presented with the MIME type "text/xml" or possibly "text/xhtml+xml". (There are some rampant discussions about that). Now, if XHTML 1.0 is still to be parsed as text/html and 1.1/2.0 as text/xml, surely this will cause extreme backwards compatability problems? For this reason, it is clear to me that XHTML 1.0 and XHTML 1.1/2.0 will need to exist side-by-side in order to become well implemented in the general Internet community. For instance, it may be possible to issue documents as XHTML 1.0/1.1, but change them using XSLT to XHTML 2.0 using CC/PP and XSLT. Then more up do date browsers would get the benefits of XHTML 1.1/2.0, whereas older browsers will get the functionality of XHTML 1.0 All indications point to the XHTML 2.0 spec. saying that XHTML 2.0 will rely on translation by XSLT for display, but I think it will also heavily require CSS, or XCSS." ---------------------------------------------------- © Copyright Sean B. Palmer, 2000. All rights reserved. A pretty obvious note I know, but it seems I can't publish anything else - work in progress! Kindest Regards, Sean B. Palmer WAP Tech Info - http://www.waptechinfo.com/ __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere! http://mail.yahoo.com/
Received on Monday, 4 September 2000 18:56:48 UTC