- From: Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 17:11:10 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time)
- To: AndrewWatt2001@aol.com
- cc: www-html@w3.org, janet@w3.org, steven.pemberton@cwi.nl, quint@w3.org, mimasa@w3.org, XHTML-L@egroups.com
On Wed, 4 Oct 2000 AndrewWatt2001@aol.com wrote: > My opinion is that the move to modularisation of XHTML is > pivotal to the future of XHTML. It is therefore important that > that move be carried out efficiently using documents which are > clear, unambiguous and factually correct. I suggest that the CR > of 3rd October 2000 has some way to go before it achieves that > standard. > > My suggestion of a need for further careful editing is intended > primarily as a reminder of the importance of clear communication > by W3C to an HTML community within which I believe there is > currently significant scepticism about the value of XHTML. Many thanks for your feedback. I will do my best to ensure that the specs are as clear as possible in the next revision. If you have any other specific points which would help us to improve, please don't hesitate to let us know. Regards, -- Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett tel/fax: +44 122 578 3011 (or 2521) +44 778 532 0444 (mobile) World Wide Web Consortium (on assignment from HP Labs)
Received on Thursday, 5 October 2000 12:11:32 UTC