- From: James P. Salsman <bovik@best.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 16:52:51 -0800 (PST)
- To: ietf@ietf.org
- Cc: www-forms@w3.org, www-html@w3.org
Some educational software advocates and I are considering asking the IETF to suspend control of certain aspects of HTML forms from the W3C until microphone upload issues are addressed. I am very interested in any public comments and private opinions on this matter. Please follow up or reply as you see fit. This is in no way a proposal to remove control of HTML -- other than regarding form device upload issues as per: http://www.bovik.org/device-upload.html -- from the W3C. I would not be suggesting this proposal if my appeal regarding W3C process was being treated seriously; there have been no replies to my appeals, or to questions from others, and and email to the www-forms list (claimed to be "public" on the W3C site) is still not being published. Cheers, James Salsman [The following analysis appeared in the March/April edition of "Extra!" magazine, published by Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (www.fair.org.) The author, Norman Solomon, is a widely-published media analyst. I believe the facts below can be partly explained by the closed and commercialized nature of the World Wide Web Consortium, especially in regard to HTML forms developments. These paragraphs are reproduced for their "fair" educational use. :jps] What Happened to the "Information Superhighway?" A few numbers tell a dramatic story about extreme changes in media fascination with the Internet. In 1995, media outlets were transfixed with the Internet as an amazing source of knowledge. Major newspapers in the U.S. and abroad referred to the "information superhighway" in 4,562 stories, according to the Nexis database. Meanwhile, articles mentioned "e-commerce" or "electronic commerce" only 915 times. Over the next few years, while Internet usage continued to grow by leaps and bounds, the news media increasingly downplayed "information superhighway" imagery (with a mere 842 mentions in major papers in 1999.) But media mania for electronic commerce exploded. In 1999, major newspapers mentioned e-commerce in 20,641 articles. Five years ago, there was tremendous enthusiasm for the emerging World Wide Web. The phrase "information superhighway" suggested that the Web was primarily a resource for learning and communication. Today, according to the prevalent spin, the Web is best understood as a way to make and spend money. The news media's recalibration of public expectations for the Internet has occurred in tandem with the steady commercialization of cyberspace. More and more, big money is weaving the Web, and the most heavily trafficked web-sites reflect that reality. Almost all of the Web's largest-volume sites are now owned by huge conglomerates. Establishing a pantheon of cyber-heroes, media coverage has cast businessmen like Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, and Steve Case as great visionaries. If your hopes for the communications future are along the lines of Microsoft, Amazon.com, and America Online, you'll be mighty pleased. -- Norman Solomon
Received on Wednesday, 29 March 2000 19:54:05 UTC