- From: Dave J Woolley <DJW@bts.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 16:39:56 +0100
- To: "'www-html@w3.org'" <www-html@w3.org>
> From: Matthew Brealey [SMTP:webmaster@richinstyle.com] > > it would have no effect), but for tables, the width is assigned > automatically, according to the width of the content, and so the width > is redundant (and > > indeed undesirable - aside from width: 100% it is rarely desirable to > assign width to tables). > [DJW:] Width is actually quite desirable for tables, and that is probably why you can set a width but not height. If you provide width and column specifications, it's possible to incrementally render the table, although I don't know a browser that does this. -- --------------------------- DISCLAIMER --------------------------------- Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of BTS.
Received on Friday, 21 July 2000 11:39:59 UTC