- From: Rowland Shaw <Rowland.Shaw@seagatesoftware.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 01:57:49 -0800
- To: www-html@w3.org
If it's any consolation, I put in for List-* headers a la RFC 2369 to be taken into account for the wishlist for Outlook Express 6 -- it's been met with a positive response, so we can but hope. -----Original Message----- From: Arjun Ray [mailto:aray@q2.net] Sent: 16 December 2000 05:05 To: www-html@w3.org Subject: Re: Off-topic: Mailing List usability On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Gerald Oskoboiny wrote: > Note also that our lists have List-* headers a la RFC 2369, so > mail user agents can make it easy for people to unsubscribe > without needing to learn how it's done on any given list. That's just it. The 'net is awash with newcomers oh sotickled pink to be equipped with slash-and-fizzle bozoware, written by bozos, who wouldn't know a RFC from a hole in the ground, to ensnare people who have nothing better to do than to allow themselves to be moronized. From the headers of recent attempts to unsubscr*be: X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) X-Mailer: VisualMail 3.0 ( http://www.minter.com.ar/visualmail ) X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.17] X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) It's hopeless, actually. We're only going to see more of this. Arjun -- Microsoft is not the answer. Microsoft is the question. NO is the answer. - Erik Naggum
Received on Monday, 18 December 2000 04:58:39 UTC