- From: Philip TAYLOR <P.Taylor@Rhbnc.Ac.Uk>
- Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 18:23:30 +0000
- To: Dave J Woolley <david.woolley@bts.co.uk>
- CC: "'www-html@w3.org'" <www-html@w3.org>
Yes, I take Dave's point; I was following the apparent intent of the original posting which had the words "select the text" : I was thinking of selecting a stretch of text from a document that already had the relevant high-level (instrinsic, HTML) tags and adding semantics to a stretch of text that was not otherwise marked/delimited. ** Phil. -------- Dave J Woolley wrote: > span and div should be treated as last resorts. The > class should, as far as possible, be added to an element > that indicates the semantics. In many cases that means that > span classes (or styles) should really go on em or strong and > that div ones should go on p or Hn. > > In terms of the HTML model, the user interface ought to prompt > for class as an attribute of em, strong etc.; however a compromise, > for those who can't think well in terms of the standard elements, > would be to have the default element type as a pseudo attribute of > the style. > > The use of span and div as holder for styles is the result > of a trivial conversion from <font face=...>. They are not there > as a carrier for formatting, but rather for structures that don't > match any of the standard elements. -- Philip TAYLOR Webmaster, Information Services Royal Holloway & Bedford New College Tel: +44 (0)1784 443172 (Office/answer'phone) Tel: +44 (0)7970 443172 (Orange/answer'phone) Fax: +44 (0)1784 434348 Mailto:P.Taylor@Rhbnc.Ac.Uk
Received on Monday, 11 December 2000 13:26:32 UTC