- From: <Jukka.Korpela@hut.fi>
- Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 15:55:24 +0300 (EET DST)
- To: "'www-html@w3.org'" <www-html@w3.org>
On Fri, 14 Apr 2000, Dave J Woolley wrote: > Someone has just sent a bug report to the lynx-dev > mailing list claiming that Lynx is at fault for > choosing a default radio button if none are marked > checked in the document. There are so many bug reports against _correct_ browser behavior. :-) > Reading the HTML 4.01 > specification leaves me confused as to what is really > intended, although all of Amaya, Netscape and IE seem > to start with no buttons down in that case. Well, this is a confusing area. It is discussed by Alan Flavell at http://ppewww.ph.gla.ac.uk/%7eflavell/www/testradio.html and by me at http://www.hut.fi/u/jkorpela/forms/choices.html#app Briefly, the HTML 2.0 specification required that the user agent provide a default (of the first item) when no author-specified default exists. The HTML 3.2 specification made the additional requirement on authors (and documents) that a form must provide a default. Then came HTML 4.0 and messed things up, perhaps because the popular browser behavior did not comply with the old requirement and it was difficult to decide what the specs should say. The sensible approach to this would be to re-establish the requirement on _documents_ to provide a default (thereby declaring documents as non-conforming if they fail to do that). Requirements on browsers would probably be futile, but this would in fact be an area where some specific error processing should be required. -- Yucca, http://www.hut.fi/u/jkorpela/ or http://yucca.hut.fi/yucca.html
Received on Friday, 14 April 2000 08:55:27 UTC