RE: "Presentational" vs. "Legacy"

Alan Isaac wrote:
> This discussion seems to take the
> equivalence of  EM EM and STRONG
> to be obvious, but is there anything in
> the spec to suggest this?
> Specifically, is there anything to suggest
> that EM EM does not suggest emphasis
> relative to the encompassing EM rather
> than relative to the encompassing block?

Hmm.  Well, no.  The spec says:
> EM:  Indicates emphasis.
> STRONG: Indicates stronger emphasis.
That's it.

All the same, I feel "emphasis relative to the context" is the
commonsense interpretation.

Jason Orendorff

Received on Tuesday, 4 April 2000 11:42:38 UTC