RE: No specification for querystrings and fragment identifiers

> From: []
> > 	I partially confused the issues here because I 
> > 	mistakenly thought that RCDATA was a valid type
> > 	for a parameter.  It appears, that, at least for
> > 	XML, parameter CDATA is like SGML content RCDATA.
> No; Section 3.3.3 of the XML spec tells how attributes
> are processed.  This includes CDATA attributes.
	There's no conflict here.  The only reason
	I specifically mention XML here is that I
	don't have the ISO standard for SGML.

Received on Tuesday, 23 November 1999 14:40:13 UTC