- From: Gordon Worley <redbird@orlando.crosswinds.net>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1999 22:59:09 -0500 (EST)
- To: www-html <www-html@w3.org>
Braden wrote: >> because the DIV element was designed for use with CSS. > >I dunno about that. A generic division element has utility beyond >application of style sheets. DIV and SPAN are elements of "last resort". You >should probably only use them when the logical implications of more >descriptive elements do not apply to your content (regardless of whether or >not you're using style sheets). It appears from the messages I have received today that I phrased this incorrectly. My trips to the actual specifications are much to far and inbetween. I was refering more so to the actual use of the DIV tag. In practice I know many Web developers who use DIV only becuase of its flexability in conjunction with CSS. Also, I code in the most abstract way possible, creating well structured documents that downgrade well enough that they are readable in older browsers, though lacking much eye candy. I'm a programmer, not a graphics designer. As far as I am concerned, HTML is just another programming language. >> Since >> CSS would be doing all of the formating, why should the DIV element be >> given more attributes to become redundent. > >Probably for consistency. > I take this back since I now know when DIV was implemented. I simply lacked much need for it [DIV] before CSS. >> Text alignment tags have been >> deprecated from HTML to seperate between structure and >> appearence. > >Yes; that doesn't mean they don't exist. > >> The redundency would make your document all the harder to read. > >Just because it's there doesn't mean you have to use it. True enough. But I'm a programmer, and want to be able to read everyones' code easily. > >> The beauty of CSS is that you only have to define the appearence of >> somellthing once, so that your HTML represents the structure of your >> document, making it easier to read. > >Indeed, but until the state of CSS support improves, many authors are >content to satisfy themselves with the less-powerful (and thus more likely >to be adequately implemented) mechanisms in HTML alone. Alas, the delima I choose ignor (although I realize some of you don't have that option B-(. ________________________________________ Red Bird Island Productions Gordon Worley http://www.crosswinds.net/orlando/~redbird/ mailto:redbird@orlando.crosswinds.net
Received on Monday, 4 January 1999 22:57:31 UTC