Re: type attr. for IMG tag

• From: Todd Fahrner <fahrner@pobox.com>
• Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1999 15:50:03 -0800
• To: Dmitry Beransky <dberansky@ucsd.edu>, www-html@w3.org
• Message-Id: <199902102347.PAA14446@mail-gw6.pacbell.net>

> Is there a reason the IMG tag is missing the 'type' attribute?  It looks
> like 'type' is defined for all the other tags that reference external data
> (such as OBJECT, A, LINK, STYLE, SCRIPT), but not IMG.

(going out on a limb here) I think many of the people who make such
decisions would prefer that you retire IMG in favor of OBJECT as soon as
possible.

Received on Wednesday, 10 February 1999 18:50:10 UTC