- From: <rev-bob@gotc.com>
- Date: 08 Dec 99 16:09:06 -0500
- To: www-html@w3.org
> Hi, I think <link> is the best solution to the discussed problem, but maybe > it can be improved to express hierarchy. > > It is quite popular and very useful to show the hierarchy of the site on > the top of the pages. Something like this: > > corporation > company > department > project > product > > with links to appropiate places. It would be nice to represent this > hierarchy with link elements instead. Why? HTML is at least supposed to be a *semantic* language - introducing new tags just to get around the unwillingness of some people to provide proper navigation is a really *bad* idea. Everything you want to do with this "extension" can be done perfectly well with the existing A element - just use that and be done with it. > I have not thought very much about the syntax, it is the concept I am > concerned about. Any thought? Yeah - I think the very fact that we're discussing "let's make a new tag for navigation" speaks for itself. Ridiculous. Rev. Robert L. Hood | http://rev-bob.gotc.com/ Get Off The Cross! | http://www.gotc.com/ Download NeoPlanet at http://www.neoplanet.com
Received on Wednesday, 8 December 1999 16:05:21 UTC