- From: <jose.kahan@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 May 1998 10:31:54 +0200 (MET DST)
- To: www-html@w3.org
In our previous episode, jose.kahan@w3.org said: From www-html-request@w3.org Tue May 26 10:23 MET 1998 Date: Tue, 26 May 1998 04:23:15 -0400 (EDT) X-Envelope-From: www-html-request@www10.w3.org Tue May 26 04:23:13 1998 Message-Id: <199805260823.KAA12255@tuvalu.inrialpes.fr> To: henryk@xs4all.nl (Henryk Gajewski) Old-Date: Tue, 26 May 1998 10:23:05 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: www-html@w3.org In-Reply-To: <l03130305b17cf691e080@[194.109.129.47]> from "Henryk Gajewski" at May 11, 98 07:30:29 pm From: jose.kahan@w3.org Reply-To: jose.kahan@w3.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL22] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Diagnostic: Not on the accept list Subject: [Spam?] Re: Looooong header of this list X-Diagnostic: Mail coming from a daemon, ignored X-Envelope-To: www-html Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 1123 In our previous episode, Henryk Gajewski said: > > Why this list has such a looooooooooong header (or whatever you call it)? > It traveles travels multiplies multiplies and often is longer than a mail > itself. What is the reason for it? Does everybody reads carefully abd > always these lines? > Greetings > Henryk Gajewski > Some of the headers you cite come from Smartlist. They are necessary to avoid loops and to detect bounces. If a message was caught by the spam filter and I reforward it to the list, my client makes a copy of the original headers as X- headers. Finally, we don't filter out any other headers sent in by the user. Cheers, -Jose ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jose Kahan | w3c/INRIA | The taste W3C technical support team | ZIRST | of rain [http://www.w3.org] | 655, avenue de l'Europe | -Why kneel? Tel: +33 (0)4 76.61.53.05 | 38330 Montbonnot Saint-Martin France |J.K (1959) -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 26 May 1998 04:32:05 UTC