- From: Sathish Kumar Rangarajan <sathish@lantana.tenet.res.in>
- Date: Wed, 6 May 1998 17:10:30 +0530 (IST)
- To: Stephanos Piperoglou <sp249@cam.ac.uk>
- cc: www-html@w3.org
> As far as Netscape is concerned, I think Mozilla's Project Raptor [1] has it > covered already so there's no need to ask. And if you're worried about > backward-compatibility, note that almost every single thing you can do in > CSS degrades gracefully in non-CSS supporting browsers (not necessarily in > non-CSS *compliant* browsers, though, but that's not our fault either, is > it?) I appreciate your interest in replying to my query. Incidentally, you've opened me to a few new terms I have'nt cared to consider earlier. 1. Backward-compatibility ----------------------- Now what's that? 2. I don't understand what this non-CSS *compliant* and non-CSS *supporting* funda is. Could you give me exmpls.
Received on Thursday, 7 May 1998 00:28:42 UTC