- From: David Norris <kg9ae@geocities.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 May 1998 18:30:26 -0500
- To: <www-html@w3.org>
-----Original Message----- From: www-html-request@w3.org [mailto:www-html-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Garth Wallace Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 1998 4:23 PM To: roconnor@uwaterloo.ca; lehors@w3.org Cc: www-html@w3.org Subject: Re: target attribute. >Excuse me? CSS positioning does not have the same functionality as >frames. How on earth would you create a replacement for resizeable >frames with off-site content using CSS? Off-site content (not documents, only pieces) is rather easy. A smarter server :) There are various methods. Simply build the document from several resources. Offsite or onsite, database or filesystem; these are of no consequence with the proper tools. (I know, it may use slightly more bandwidth. And, you would need a web host that provides/allows this. However, nothing is without flaw. If you really needed this capability then it would be easy to find at little to no cost.) Documents likely should be linked not framed. HTML should be abstracted from the underlying methods and madness. HTML is the end result, not necessarily the means to get to there. I don't think it is HTML's place to do everything. I still say that functionality should be balanced across the various layers of protocols and specifications. In a broader sense, a document should be one idea returned in one continuous stream. This is looking from a accessibility perspective, as well. Related ideas should be links from that document. Frames should be disowned and forgotten. In a sense, you ask one server one question, and, that server returns one answer from whatever sources it knows to get it. Frames return you a jumble of locations to get an answer, but, no answer itself. It is a simplistic view, however, it is also a significant one. Some people don't mind frames. Some people can't deal with frames. Others won't deal with frames. Those are three groups, two of which are excluded from using that document. HTML is a semantic markup language. Frames are not semantic in any sense of the word. I agree with Stephanos, as well. He covered most of my feelings toward frames quite well. The current frames implementation is simply not well designed. ,David Norris World Wide Web - http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Lab/1652/ Illusionary Web - http://illusionary.dyn.ml.org/ <-- 02:00 - 10:00 GMT Video/Audio Phone - callto:illusionary.dyn.ml.org Page via mail - 412039@pager.mirabilis.com ICQ Universal Internet Number - 412039 E-Mail - kg9ae@geocities.com
Received on Tuesday, 5 May 1998 19:30:25 UTC