- From: James Green <jmkgre@essex.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jan 1998 14:41:43 +0000 (GMT)
- To: www-css@w3.org
- Cc: www-html@w3.org
Originally on www-html now crossposted to www-css: On Mon, 26 Jan 1998 12:50:06 +0100 Rasmus Kaj <kaj@cityonline.se> wrote: > >>>>> "JG" == James Green <jmkgre@essex.ac.uk> writes: > > >> I never use non-<HR> separators, simply because they don't behave well > >> for browsers on different screen sizes. > > JG> Agreed. However, the existance of simple colour gradients in CSS may be > JG> nice. > > I've not actually tested this, but something like the following style > should work: > > HR { width: 100%; height: 1ex; > background-image: url(gradient.gif); > border: none; /* Some browsers may defaultrender a HR as a border */ > } > > Then, you can use different classes of HR with different gradients, or > maybe different sizes ... This is not what I intended. When I think of an idea, I like to think of a way whereby the machine can do as much of the work as possible. In asking for gradients, I was thinking somwhere along the line of: HR { width: 100%; left-color: blue; right-color: red; gradient-step: 4 } This would give a horizontal rule of maximum page-width, default height, specifying that the left-most area be blue, red for the right-most area, merging to each other in four coloured steps. Enhancing on this, top, bottom, even corners could be specified. All that would be needed is a clever browser and colour support on the client OS. Comments on the above welcome. Regards, James Green Term e-mail: jmkgre@essex.ac.uk | Home e-mail: jg@cyberstorm.demon.co.uk Homepage: http://www.cyberstorm.demon.co.uk
Received on Monday, 26 January 1998 09:43:16 UTC