- From: James Green <jmkgre@essex.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jan 1998 14:41:43 +0000 (GMT)
- To: www-css@w3.org
- Cc: www-html@w3.org
Originally on www-html now crossposted to www-css:
On Mon, 26 Jan 1998 12:50:06 +0100 Rasmus Kaj <kaj@cityonline.se> wrote:
> >>>>> "JG" == James Green <jmkgre@essex.ac.uk> writes:
>
> >> I never use non-<HR> separators, simply because they don't behave well
> >> for browsers on different screen sizes.
>
> JG> Agreed. However, the existance of simple colour gradients in CSS may be
> JG> nice.
>
> I've not actually tested this, but something like the following style
> should work:
>
> HR { width: 100%; height: 1ex;
> background-image: url(gradient.gif);
> border: none; /* Some browsers may defaultrender a HR as a border */
> }
>
> Then, you can use different classes of HR with different gradients, or
> maybe different sizes ...
This is not what I intended. When I think of an idea, I like to think
of a way whereby the machine can do as much of the work as possible. In
asking for gradients, I was thinking somwhere along the line of:
HR
{
width: 100%;
left-color: blue;
right-color: red;
gradient-step: 4
}
This would give a horizontal rule of maximum page-width, default
height, specifying that the left-most area be blue, red for the
right-most area, merging to each other in four coloured steps.
Enhancing on this, top, bottom, even corners could be specified. All
that would be needed is a clever browser and colour support on the
client OS.
Comments on the above welcome.
Regards,
James Green
Term e-mail: jmkgre@essex.ac.uk | Home e-mail: jg@cyberstorm.demon.co.uk
Homepage: http://www.cyberstorm.demon.co.uk
Received on Monday, 26 January 1998 09:43:16 UTC