- From: Jukka Korpela <jkorpela@cc.hut.fi>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jan 1998 14:53:10 +0200 (EET)
- To: www-html@w3.org
On Fri, 16 Jan 1998, John Wright wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 1998 at 07:35:05PM -0500, Liam Quinn wrote: > > At 01:43 PM 15/01/98 +0000, James Green wrote: > > ><MIRROR HREF="http://www.myname.com.au/"> > > What about > > <LINK REL="Alternate" HREF="http://www.myname.com.au/" TYPE="text/html"> Actually, these address other problems than the one I presented and for which I suggested ALTHREF. First, the LINK REL="Alternate" construct is fine but it defines a relationship between the document where it occurs and another document (and I suppose the intended meaning was that the other would be real alternative, such as translation or abridged version, as regards to content or form, not just another address where another _copy_ of the document resides). Second, I'm not sure what a MIRROR element (or LINK REL="Mirror") would achieve in practice. I was specifically thinking of links created using the A element and simply providing alternative addresses (of copies of essentially the same document). The same idea might be applied to a LINK element, too, whether its REL="Alternate" link or something else. > Also, > <A HREF="http://www.place.co.uk/" ALSO="http://www.place.com.au">Place</A> > would work just as well. > > > ? No extension to HTML needed. > > This too. Actually it looks just like my proposal except for the name of the new attribute. (ALSO is certainly more legible than ALTHREF. I just thought we might need to stick to the classical obscure naming style of HREF, :-) But naturally it _would_ be an extension to HTML, although not a very radical one, just adding an optional attribute. Yucca, http://www.hut.fi/u/jkorpela/
Received on Friday, 16 January 1998 07:53:42 UTC