- From: Braden N. McDaniel <braden@shadow.net>
- Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1998 19:28:49 -0400
- To: "'David Perrell'" <davidp@earthlink.net>
- Cc: "'W3C HTML Mailing List (E-mail)'" <www-html@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: David Perrell [mailto:davidp@earthlink.net] > Sent: Thursday, August 20, 1998 6:33 PM > To: braden@endoframe.com > Cc: 'W3C HTML Mailing List (E-mail)' > Subject: Re: Hyperlinks in OBJECT inclusions [snip] > >Is it reasonable that these links should behave totally differently? > > > Yes, because the example is silly. Yes, it was. Thanks for providing a more credible example. ;-) > If what you're trying to > present to the > user is content at w3, why use "inclusion.html" as the object? > > Consider this example: [snip] > Far more useful if the link target is the embedded window, IMHO. So use IFRAME. Why should OBJECT behave the same way? Braden
Received on Thursday, 20 August 1998 19:22:27 UTC