- From: Robert Rothenberg <wlkngowl@unix.asb.com>
- Date: Sat, 15 Aug 1998 21:43:21 -0400
- To: mwm@contessa.phone.net (Mike Meyer)
- CC: www-html@w3.org
On 7 Aug 98,, Mike Meyer wrote: > No, that's not what I'm saying. After you eliminate the fluff (like > random quotes) and bad ideas (like pages that change the HTML based on the > client), you're left with either real dynamic data - for which SSI > generally isn't sufficient - or things that tend to be built from parts, > and then served to many people with the same content. Given that disk is > cheap, upgrading disk is cheaper than upgrading CPU, and the cache > problems mentioned above, the latter is *much* better done by building the > page once and updating it when one or more parts of the data change. Let's say you've got a few hundred pages on your site, and would like to use a common header and footer for the document? Now let's say after a while you decide to change the content of the header and footer, to give the site a new look... SSIs are wonderful for this purpose. Rob
Received on Saturday, 15 August 1998 21:43:03 UTC