- From: Braden N. McDaniel <braden@shadow.net>
- Date: Mon, 3 Aug 1998 12:52:41 -0700
- To: "'David Perrell'" <davidp@earthlink.net>, "'HTML'" <www-html@w3.org>, "'Style'" <www-style@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: www-style-request@w3.org [mailto:www-style-request@w3.org]On > Behalf Of David Perrell > Sent: Monday, August 03, 1998 11:33 AM > To: 'HTML'; 'Style' > Subject: Re: OBJECT, inheritance, and rendering > But if the purpose of OBJECT is to nest something independent of the > enclosing document within its own subwindow, I have a bit of a problem with your wording here, based on conclusions drawn earlier in this thread. We established that an embedded *HTML* document should be independent of the host document, in its own subwindow, and thus the "base background" of the inclusion should be the UA-specific default backgound. I'm not convinced it's appropriate to state things in these terms for *all* media types. If what you say above is accurate for all media types, consider the following: <OBJECT DATA="myimage.png" TYPE="image/png">Look, Ma! No PNG!</OBJECT> If myimage.png has transparent portions, they would show through the UA-default backgound color--and this, I submit, is *not* the desired behavior. If this were the specfied behavior, it would make transparency virtually useless with inclusions via OBJECT, severly limiting the utility of the element. Braden
Received on Monday, 3 August 1998 15:45:52 UTC