- From: Sue Jordan <sue@css.nu>
- Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1998 20:56:55 -0400 (EDT)
- To: "'HTML'" <www-html@w3.org>
[cc's trimmed; since HTML 4.0 is referenced, www-style omitted] Braden N. McDaniel wrote: > > > Subject: Re: OBJECT, inheritance, and rendering ...David wrote: > > There are two ways an included HTML document might be rendered: > > 1. As a nested UA window, independent of the enclosing > > document. The OBJECT > > simply defines the dimensions of the nested window. The > > enclosed document is > > rendered as if it were a new document, with no regard to the display > > properties of the enclosing document at the point of insertion. > > "Independent" is a strong word. How strongly do you mean it? The statement is a paraphrase from: <URI:http://www.w3.org/TR/PR-html40/struct/objects.html#h-13.5> where the word independent is also used. [...] > As stated, per my interpretation of the specs, this is not entirely > accurate. The host document *can* affect the background color of the > included document, but not the foreground color. But I find no ambiguity in: "Also, an embedded document does not inherit style information from the main document.", from the URI above. I've tried to re-read this thread, but in deleting cc's of every message, I may have inadvertently deleted your cite from the recommendation on which you base your statement that the "host document *can* affect the background color..." . That would clearly conflict with the quote above, and one or the other of the cites would be errata fodder. Sue Jordan
Received on Monday, 3 August 1998 15:22:32 UTC