- From: Rob <wlkngowl@unix.asb.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 00:30:23 -0500
- To: Markku Savela <msa@anise.tte.vtt.fi>
- CC: www-html@w3.org
On 25 Sep 97, Markku Savela <msa@anise.tte.vtt.fi> wrote: > [..] > The 'class' attribute also takes HTML dangerously close to application > specific tagging systems. "<span class=taxon> ... </span>" is very > close to "<taxon> ... </taxon>". Perhaps this is the right way to > proceed in some cases: you can have WEB document and logical document > in the same source (without needing to define a new SGML application > and DTD). Then, one might question what we need XML for? Since many academic disciplines (such as in psychology/psychiatry) have their own way of marking up printed documents and papers, it makes sense for a standard CSS (and DSSSL?) style sheet to emerge with a reserved namespace of classes. Using SGML/XML makes more sense, but HTML browsers are more widely available. Rob
Received on Friday, 26 September 1997 00:33:30 UTC