- From: Mike Meyer <mwm@contessa.phone.net>
- Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 15:27:08 PST
- To: www-html@w3.org
> Date: 25 Sep 1997 22:41:12 +0100 > From: Peter Flynn <pflynn@imbolc.ucc.ie> > > Mike writes: > HTML has a number of ways to specify the source of a hyperlink. Prior > to HTML 4.0, they were the A and FORM elements. Even if there is only > > There is also IMG, LINK, META, ISINDEX, BASE, and FIG in HTML3, > and BGSOUND, APPLET, OBJECT, and EMBED in other clothing. Others keep telling me that HTML 3, in spite of being an advance over it's successors, is dead, so I didn't count FIG. Possibly I misused the terminology, but the rest are not what I'd call sources for hyperlinks. They are references to objects related to the current document. The user doesn't get a button on the page to go fetch those objects. Of course, IMG gets regularly abused to GET a hit counter. That doesn't change the correctness of the data on the server, though - it's wrong either way. I do wonder how POST would change that, though I suspect the answer is "not enough to matter". But yeah - it'd be nice if authors were allowed to specify that all of those were dynamic, and should be fetched only by explicit action by the user. I specifically chose *not* to propose alterations to the 4.0 DTD to deal with this, as some of them have multiple attributes that take URLs. <mike
Received on Thursday, 25 September 1997 18:37:23 UTC