- From: Arnoud <galactus@htmlhelp.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 18:59:14 +0200
- To: www-html@w3.org
In article <l03110701b03cbfe1fc5e@[192.168.1.117]>, Jordan Reiter <jreiter@mail.slc.edu> wrote: > I am sick, sick, *sick* of this holier-than-thou attitude that seems to say > that anyone who every made a page that *looked* like something is a peice > of crap and is responsible for turning the web into a peice of bloated > waste. The problem is more that the *methods* used to create "good looking" websites suck. This, combined with the apparent willingness of most authors to use these crappy extensions to get something that looks decent in an otherwise boring browser, is what gets out the "holier-than- thou" attitude. There *are* good solutions to this, but they're not implemented, and 'designers' who feel happy with using the half-baked solutions are primarily responsible for keeping the situation as it is now. -- E-mail: galactus@htmlhelp.com .................... PGP Key: 512/63B0E665 Maintainer of WDG's HTML reference: <http://www.htmlhelp.com/reference/>
Received on Thursday, 11 September 1997 13:07:41 UTC