Re: Cougar DTD

In article <>,
Tomasz Pilat <> wrote:
> I think I have found 2 next (little) bugs in Cougar DTD (29/IV/97).

I'm not enough of an SGML wizard to answer your syntax questions,
but ..

> BTW2: According to DTD nesting NOFRAMES/NOSCRIPT (from %block) is allowed.
>  Is this purposeful?

Perhaps, perhaps not. A DTD is not intended to allow only the
"purposeful" constructs. For example, <SUP><TEXTAREA></TEXTAREA></SUP>
is permitted, but I really can't see the point of it..

E-mail: .................... PGP Key: 512/63B0E665
Maintainer of WDG's HTML reference: <>

Received on Saturday, 10 May 1997 13:12:07 UTC