Cougar DTD - I18N

I have noticed some discrepancies between the Cougar DTD and RFC 2070. If
they are intentional, would it be possible to have an explanation?

The main discrepancy is the ommision of %just from the following elements:
OL, UL, DIR, MENU, LI, BLOCKQUOTE, ADDRESS.

Also, the DIR and LANG attributes were deleted for the ADDRESS, IMG, DIR,
FORM, HEAD, HTML, IMG, LISTING, MENU, PLAINTEXT, XMP.

Jonathan

Received on Friday, 2 May 1997 19:20:11 UTC