- From: <BruceLeban@akimbo.com>
- Date: Sat, 22 Mar 1997 22:58:37 -0500 (EST)
- To: www-html@w3.org
>From: fepotts@fepco.com (F. E. Potts)
>HTML is not a good storage medium, because HTML is a dying markup
>language (only it doesn't know it yet :-).
>SGML is a good storage medium, because it is a stable standard that has
>the capability to be converted into "the markup language of the
>moment". One markup language of the moment is HTML 3.2, but HTML is a
>moving target and must be treated as such.
>That's a totally bogus argument--we are talking long-term storage here,
>and only documents written to a standard will be able to survive. And
>that's the problem with HTML as written by most non-pros: it is tested
>against a "browser" rather than against a DTD.
There are a lot of people who think HTML is a page design language, not a
markup language, not a storage medium. That's why I said the browser test
was a "pragmatic" one. It reflects how HTML is actually used. To
paraphrase what you wrote:
One problem with HTML as written by most people: it is
tested against at most one browser.
Maybe HTML isn't "supposed" to be a PDL. So what?
--- Bruce Leban
Akimbo Systems
http://www.akimbo.com/globetrotter
Publish on the web without learning HTML! (Really.)
Received on Saturday, 22 March 1997 22:58:30 UTC