- From: <BruceLeban@akimbo.com>
- Date: Sat, 22 Mar 1997 22:58:37 -0500 (EST)
- To: www-html@w3.org
>From: fepotts@fepco.com (F. E. Potts) >HTML is not a good storage medium, because HTML is a dying markup >language (only it doesn't know it yet :-). >SGML is a good storage medium, because it is a stable standard that has >the capability to be converted into "the markup language of the >moment". One markup language of the moment is HTML 3.2, but HTML is a >moving target and must be treated as such. >That's a totally bogus argument--we are talking long-term storage here, >and only documents written to a standard will be able to survive. And >that's the problem with HTML as written by most non-pros: it is tested >against a "browser" rather than against a DTD. There are a lot of people who think HTML is a page design language, not a markup language, not a storage medium. That's why I said the browser test was a "pragmatic" one. It reflects how HTML is actually used. To paraphrase what you wrote: One problem with HTML as written by most people: it is tested against at most one browser. Maybe HTML isn't "supposed" to be a PDL. So what? --- Bruce Leban Akimbo Systems http://www.akimbo.com/globetrotter Publish on the web without learning HTML! (Really.)
Received on Saturday, 22 March 1997 22:58:30 UTC