- From: Misha Wolf <misha.wolf@reuters.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jun 1997 20:11:37 +0000 (GMT)
- To: Time Zones <tz@elsie.nci.nih.gov>, meta2 <meta2@mrrl.lut.ac.uk>, www-html <www-html@w3.org>, Peter Ciuffetti <Peter_Ciuffetti@silverplatter.com>
Pete Ciuffetti has given me permission to quote his private mail: > In your levels of granularity, what do you think about allowing year-only, > "YYYY" and year-month "YYYY-MM". This would help solve a need I perceive > in our database design at SilverPlatter. Most of our records are > bibliographic and they specify the date of publication for some described > item like a book or journal. Typically this is just a year, like "1997" or > it is a year and month, "Feb 1997", sometimes a day is specified. > > In my metadata, I'd like to store whatever granularity that makes sense for > the published item and I would like all the dates to conform to a standard. > But no standard seems to consider these broader levels of granularity. ISO 8601 does. I would be very happy to add these options to the profile. > Also, in these broad levels for comparison purposes, I suggest implied > values would be 01 for an unspecified month, and 01 for an unspecified day. For the moment, I have backed away from suggesting how dates of differing granularities be compared, as it is contentious. > Regards, > Pete Ciuffetti > SilverPlatter ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Misha Wolf Email: misha.wolf@reuters.com 85 Fleet Street Standards Manager Voice: +44 171 542 6722 London EC4P 4AJ Reuters Limited Fax : +44 171 542 8314 UK ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Reuters Ltd.
Received on Thursday, 26 June 1997 15:12:54 UTC