- From: Arnoud <galactus@htmlhelp.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jun 1997 19:33:37 +0200
- To: www-html@w3.org
In article <v03102800afc9ddcc6a6c@[205.149.180.135]>, Walter Ian Kaye <walter@natural-innovations.com> wrote: > At 11:35a +0200 06/15/97, Arnoud "Galactus" Engelfriet wrote: > > 1) it breaks all other clients, as RFC 1738 defines the value of > > mailto to be an email address only. Thus, mail from those clients > > will bounce, as "htmlhelp.com?subject=hello" is not a valid host. > > So update the client -- it's easy to add support for this. Perhaps, even though the RFC would have to be superseded in order to make this behaviour legal. And as far as I can tell, most other HTML extensions were generally harmless in that they simply weren't available (or were ignored) on non-supporting browsers. > > 4) You only have 1024 characters for subject and other headers (assuming > > you do 2). > > You don't need more than that -- it's only meant for creating a template > email message, not a long dissertation. 1024 characters is a lot! :) Well, if it's only for a ?subject, but if you want to generalize this method (the draft mentioned earlier in this thread supports that) then you can run into that problem quickly. > > or perhaps adding an attribute a la USEMAP (USEAPP? PARAMLIST?) > > to A that links to a list of parameters, then you could even re-use > > the information in multiple mailto links. > > And how would you pass that to other applications? User agent issue. The browser can collect the PARAMs and create a command line for that, or parse it through an OLE communication or whatever. -- E-mail: galactus@htmlhelp.com .................... PGP Key: 512/63B0E665 Maintainer of WDG's HTML reference: <http://www.htmlhelp.com/reference/>
Received on Monday, 16 June 1997 13:40:56 UTC