- From: Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor <roconnor@wronski.math.uwaterloo.ca>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jul 1997 12:40:11 -0400 (EDT)
- To: www-html@w3.org
Joe English wrote: > Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> wrote: > > > > The editors propose to use a DTD entity to control marked > > sections to allow the DTD to either have a FRAMESET and no > > BODY or a BODY and no FRAMESET depending on the value of > > the entity. > > > How would authors specify which version of the DTD to use? > Would there be two different PUBLIC identifiers? > > <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0//EN"> > <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Frameset//EN"> > > Or would it be specified in the internal subset: > > <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "..." > [ > <!ENTITY % framesets "INCLUDE"> > ]> I thought the idea was to use <!DOCTYPE FRAMESET PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0//EN"> -- Russell O'Connor roconnor@uwaterloo.ca <URL:http://www.undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca/%7Eroconnor/> "And truth irreversibly destroys the meaning of its own message" -- Anindita Dutta, "The Paradox of Truth, the Truth of Entropy"
Received on Wednesday, 30 July 1997 12:40:14 UTC