- From: Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor <roconnor@wronski.math.uwaterloo.ca>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jul 1997 12:40:11 -0400 (EDT)
- To: www-html@w3.org
Joe English wrote:
> Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> wrote:
> >
> > The editors propose to use a DTD entity to control marked
> > sections to allow the DTD to either have a FRAMESET and no
> > BODY or a BODY and no FRAMESET depending on the value of
> > the entity.
>
>
> How would authors specify which version of the DTD to use?
> Would there be two different PUBLIC identifiers?
>
> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0//EN">
> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Frameset//EN">
>
> Or would it be specified in the internal subset:
>
> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "..."
> [
> <!ENTITY % framesets "INCLUDE">
> ]>
I thought the idea was to use
<!DOCTYPE FRAMESET PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0//EN">
--
Russell O'Connor roconnor@uwaterloo.ca
<URL:http://www.undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca/%7Eroconnor/>
"And truth irreversibly destroys the meaning of its own message"
-- Anindita Dutta, "The Paradox of Truth, the Truth of Entropy"
Received on Wednesday, 30 July 1997 12:40:14 UTC