- From: Rob <wlkngowl@unix.asb.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jul 1997 12:15:53 -0500
- To: Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
- CC: www-html@w3.org
On Mon, 28 Jul 1997 Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> wrote: > [..] > I am sympathetic to the stricter model (DT+, DD)+ and would > like to hear arguments as to why this would be a bad idea. I see nothing wrong with (DT, DD+) instead. To me this makes more sense than multiple DT elements, since (logically) a term can have multiple definitions. Rob --- Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl (wlkngowl@unix.asb.com) Se habla PGP. http://www.asb.com/usr/wlkngowl
Received on Monday, 28 July 1997 12:17:49 UTC