- From: David Perrell <davidp@earthlink.net>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jul 1997 08:41:26 -0700
- To: <www-html@w3.org>
Liam Quinn wrote: > I'm sure that was fun... Now how is declaring the non-breaking space as > collapsible different than deprecating elements like FONT? As I understand it, deprecating an element is done when there is another, preferred method of accomplishing the same thing. Deprecating FONT makes no judgment about the rightness or wrongness of FONT in its previous usage, nor does it demand that UAs stop supporting it. Current usage of consecutive   is common. Declaring it as wrong immediately renders thousands of pages illegal. Since most browsers now treat   as if it were a character, with no special processing, it would be better to leave the situation as it is, with no formal declaration of 'correct' use, than it would be to declare common usage unequivocally wrong. David Perrell
Received on Monday, 14 July 1997 11:41:39 UTC