Re: Support for Vector Images

At 1:52p +0000 12/01/97, Clive Bruton wrote:
>As a further comparison I'd consider PDF to be everything an EPS is (and
>more) without some of the above noted overheads, so grabbing some info
>that I just happen to have to hand:
>     EPS  182k      Contains several complicated shapes, colour
>                    and layer info, as well as a header.
>     PDF  28k       Essentially the raw shapes
>Thus I'd suggest that PDF and CGM are better comparisons, than EPS and

True. In fact, PDF is designed to be the successor to EPS.

  Walter Ian Kaye <boo@SLAC.Stanford.EDU>        Menlo Park, CA
  Perl on Unix, AppleScript on MacOS, at the nation's first WWW server.
  More good stuff at my <> site.

Received on Monday, 1 December 1997 12:03:28 UTC