- From: Peter Flynn <pflynn@curia.ucc.ie>
- Date: 29 Sep 1996 20:17:15 +0100
- To: MACRIDES@SCI.WFBR.EDU
- Cc: www-html@w3.org
All very interesting, perhaps, but how far have you gotten on your DTD that restores all the missing 3.0 markup and could be used for the DOCTYPE with validators, rather than having to choose among one or another that is missing something or other and will yield false errors if one's client supports, and one's markup uses, the missing 3.0 markup plus the newer markup? A perhaps small percentage of Webizens, but very, very large absolute number of people who couldn't write such a DTD themselves need it. We want to "Download it now!!!!" :) :) This week some time. It's gotten as far as Near&Far, so it parses OK, but I'm checking their (copious) reports to make sure all the bits that ought to be in there really are. I was tempted to keep the switch for Deprecated/Recommended but decided not to: there is no attempt at backward compatibility with stuff that is broken (ie there's no XMP or LISTING) but there is DIR and MENU. FRAME, STYLE, SCRIPT etc are all there, but MATH is untouched from HTML3 so far: I'm no mathematician so I'm really not qualified to change it. The only working changes are to add HR to the content model for lists, because it seems reasonable to allow rules between long items (sugar, but harmless). I made ALT #REQUIRED in IMG, but an interesting problem comes up when you try to use a graphical editor: how do you tell it to insert ALT="" when you want an explicit null string :-) ///Peter
Received on Sunday, 29 September 1996 15:15:37 UTC