- From: Peter Flynn <pflynn@curia.ucc.ie>
- Date: 23 Sep 1996 15:28:48 +0100
- To: msftrncs@htcnet.com
- Cc: www-html@w3.org
Howed I know? Simple, I wrote this as an email message meanning that you have no choice, I my mail program wraps at 72 characters! HTML on the otherhand wraps at each users terminal size, THATS WHY I NEED TO SUGGEST WRAP POINTS! You were describing _enforced_ wrap points, not _suggested- ones. Suggesting wrap points is still the last resort: browsers need to be able to handle much better algorithmic wrapping first. Where can I maybe find this ... I know you mentioned lots of names above... but I don't remember seeing any sources... Read the references I gave. Start with Appendix H of the TeXbook (Knuth, D; Addison-Wesley, ISBN 0-201-13447-0). Yes there is, one called SHY... MSIE even supports it, but HTML 3.2 doesn't yet define it although its mentioned in the spec... There are lots of things missing from HTML 3.2, especially in the areas of serious information content. It's a sort of HTML3 Lite with the useful bits removed and some obsolete stuff reinserted, but with some handy new elements as well (and some less so :-) I don't understand you here... The most I have seen is browsers that will act upon normal hyphens which can sometimes be breaks... I don't see where any automatic algorythem could be used on english words without some risk of screwing up either... Then you do seriously need to go and look at typesetting systems if you want to understand how it works. Browsers are very clever in many ways, but they were mostly written by people who had no knowledge of typographic presentation, and have had to reinvent the wheel even to get where they are today. ///Peter
Received on Monday, 23 September 1996 10:31:28 UTC