- From: Dan Delaney <dgdela01@homer.louisville.edu>
- Date: Mon, 18 Mar 1996 10:00:25 -0500 (EST)
- To: WWW HTML Mailing List <www-html@w3.org>
Alright. I have read from many people that the HTML 3.0 draft is not accurate. So there are a few tags I would like to know about. I want to know if these tags are generally going to be supported by the majority of browsers: 1) <FONT SIZE=+x> blah blah blah </FONT> (Mosaic still doesn't recognize this) 2) <TABLES BORDER=x> (Mosaic ignores the size of the border you specify. If you put 0 they put a border anyway!) 3) <IMG ... BORDER=0> (Mosaic still ignores the border specification for an image when it is used as a link. What's really funny is that their own "What's New" page uses this on its images but their own browser doesn't support it! Check it out! It looks a lot better in Netscape because Netscape listens to the border spec and doesn't put that horrible blue line around it. http://www.ncsa.uiuc.edu/SDG/Software/Mosaic/Docs/whats-new.html So. Does anyone have any opinion about these particular tags and extensions to tags. I think they are all great. And a LOT a page authors use them (including NCSA even though their own browser doesn't support them!) My organization (a university) doesn't want to have their web pages readable only on Netscape. But, these basic tag extensions are very useful for making the pages look good. Thanks. --Dan Delaney //// (o o) ----------------------------------------------------ooOO---()---OOoo---- ------------------------------------------------- The -- Daniel G. Delaney (Dionysos) | Louisville Times | University Publications (Univ. of Lou.) | Chorus | dgdela01@Homer.Louisville.edu | ooooO Ooooo | Houchens Building --\ |--------| /--- 502-852-0716 \_| |_/
Received on Monday, 18 March 1996 10:00:29 UTC