- From: Dan Delaney <dgdela01@homer.louisville.edu>
- Date: Mon, 18 Mar 1996 10:00:25 -0500 (EST)
- To: WWW HTML Mailing List <www-html@w3.org>
Alright. I have read from many people that the HTML 3.0 draft is not
accurate. So there are a few tags I would like to know about. I want to
know if these tags are generally going to be supported by the majority of
browsers:
1) <FONT SIZE=+x> blah blah blah </FONT>
(Mosaic still doesn't recognize this)
2) <TABLES BORDER=x>
(Mosaic ignores the size of the border you specify. If you put 0 they
put a border anyway!)
3) <IMG ... BORDER=0>
(Mosaic still ignores the border specification for an image when it
is used as a link. What's really funny is that their own "What's
New" page uses this on its images but their own browser doesn't
support it! Check it out! It looks a lot better in Netscape because
Netscape listens to the border spec and doesn't put that horrible blue
line around it.
http://www.ncsa.uiuc.edu/SDG/Software/Mosaic/Docs/whats-new.html
So. Does anyone have any opinion about these particular tags and
extensions to tags. I think they are all great. And a LOT a page authors
use them (including NCSA even though their own browser doesn't support them!)
My organization (a university) doesn't want to have their web pages
readable only on Netscape. But, these basic tag extensions are very
useful for making the pages look good.
Thanks.
--Dan Delaney
////
(o o)
----------------------------------------------------ooOO---()---OOoo----
------------------------------------------------- The --
Daniel G. Delaney (Dionysos) | Louisville Times |
University Publications (Univ. of Lou.) | Chorus |
dgdela01@Homer.Louisville.edu | ooooO Ooooo |
Houchens Building --\ |--------| /---
502-852-0716 \_| |_/
Received on Monday, 18 March 1996 10:00:29 UTC