- From: The Boss <matthew@tir.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jun 1996 16:40:30 -0400
- To: Adrian Lozano <adrian@spray.se>
- Cc: www-html@w3.org
Adrian Lozano wrote: > > THE BOSS CREATOR OF TRUE LINK: > > Yes I agree the explanation is better then a footnote!! > > Galactus: > > How, if the footnote can contain markup and the explanation can't? > > THE BOSS CREATOR OF TRUE LINK: > > Because if your giving an explanation you don't need a hyperlink in > > it and if you want one you can ask to have it added it to the > > explanation tag!! > ^^^ > Seems to me that the EXPLANATION >>attribute<< is just a special > case of the proposed FN tag. Besides, having EXPLANATION be an > attribute to A appears arbitrary. What would ferinstance > > <A EXPLANATION="foo" HREF="foo.html">bar</A> > > do? Yeah that would work great!! -- THE BOSS CREATOR OF TRUE LINK HOME WEB PAGE: http://www.tir.com/~matthew/ E-MAIL: matthew@tir.com A member of the HTML Writers Guild I'm also a member of Whos Who Online! Want a dynamic website? Please e-mail me or call 810-688-2016
Received on Thursday, 27 June 1996 16:42:43 UTC