- From: Solko, Dave (SOLKODE) <SOLKODE@exchange.uc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jun 1996 22:33:10 -0400
- To: "'www-html@w3.org'" <www-html@w3.org>, "'galactus@stack.urc.tue.nl'" <galactus@stack.urc.tue.nl>
>
>From: galactus@stack.urc.tue.nl
>Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 1996 7:58PM
>
>
>According to Netscape, frames are supposed to *replace* the normal
>body, so they should either be IN the head, or follow directly
>after it.
According to NS's own page on frames:
<HTML> <HEAD> </HEAD> <FRAMESET> </FRAMESET> </HTML> So, I wouldn't
recommend putting the <frameset> in the head.
Also:
"within the FRAMESET you can only have other nested FRAMESET tags,
FRAME tags, or the NOFRAMES tag."
and
"A Frame-capable Internet client ignores all tags and data between
start and end NOFRAMES tags."
I inferred that they intended the FRAMESET to replace the BODY. And
since BODY-contained elements can appear within the NOFRAMES element --
for non-frame browsers, this too implies that the FRAMESET should exist
outside the HEAD.
,,,
---------D a v e S o l k o-----------513.556.5264-----ooo0-(.
.)-0ooo-----
http://www.cat.uc.edu/dave/ dave.solko@uc.edu (_)| Designer
http://www.cat.uc.edu/dave/Frontier/ Frontier Archive |
Consultant
http://www.uc.edu/www/newsrecord/index.htmlx | Webmaster
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
http://ucunix.san.uc.edu/~solkode/tres_bizar/ The stranger side of the
web
---------------------------------------------------------ooo0---0ooo-----
---
Received on Wednesday, 26 June 1996 22:24:45 UTC