- From: MegaZone <megazone@livingston.com>
- Date: Sun, 23 Jun 1996 02:54:32 -0700 (PDT)
- To: www-html@w3.org
Once upon a time S.N.Brodie@ecs.soton.ac.uk shaped the electrons to say... >I store the original size of the image (in pixels) with the image, and >then calculate the position of the mouse click within the displayed >version as a percentage of the displayed width & height and multiply >appropriately by the original width & height. Isn't this how other >browsers maintain the consistency? Basically they tell you to just not resize the image with height and width tags. The ones I've seen just return the coords where you clicked - no processing on them. And since, IMHO, using the height and width tags to habitually resize images is dumb, I like this since it prevents such use on an imagemap. Forcing people to author their images at the appropriate size is a *good* thing as far as I am concerned. And since image resizing isn't supported on all browsers it is a bad habit. I use heighth and width to speed rendering by setting the actual size. -MZ -- Livingston Enterprises - Chair, Department of Interstitial Affairs Phone: 800-458-9966 510-426-0770 FAX: 510-426-8951 megazone@livingston.com For support requests: support@livingston.com <http://www.livingston.com/> Snail mail: 6920 Koll Center Parkway #220, Pleasanton, CA 94566
Received on Sunday, 23 June 1996 05:51:54 UTC