- From: Ka-Ping Yee <s-ping@orange.cv.tottori-u.ac.jp>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jun 1996 16:09:37 +0900
- To: Ankur Bhatnagar <ankurb@wipsys.soft.net>
- Cc: www-html@w3.org
About a SRC attribute for UL, LI, HR, and so on: i fully support this idea and am also quite surprised and disappointed to find it missing from the HTML 3.2 spec. Why on earth was it removed?! And may i ask what NOSHADE is doing on HR, why HR WIDTH is in %Pixels, and why PLAIN is gone from lists? It also seems strange that LINK has the ID attribute but nothing else does. It may be too late for FONT (choke) but at least we can still try to get *some* things right. Ka-Ping Yee ------------------------------------------- Ankur Bhatnagar wrote: > > Jonathan Gapen wrote: > > > quite disappointed to see HTML 3.2 leaves it out. I'd like to see a SRC > > attribute for HR, which specifies an image to use as the horizontal rule, and > > a SRC attribute for UL, which specifies an image to use as the bullet, with a > > possible SRC for LI, which overrides the list's image for that one item. > > I wish to make known my whole hearted support to Jonathan's idea.
Received on Monday, 17 June 1996 03:16:01 UTC