- From: Arnoud <galactus@stack.urc.tue.nl>
- Date: Sun, 28 Jul 1996 20:12:51 +0200
- To: www-html@w3.org
In article <v03007803ae20821ce07a@[205.149.180.135]>, Walter Ian Kaye <boo@best.com> wrote: > At 9:10p +0200 07/27/96, Arnoud "Galactus" Engelfriet wrote: > >I think that since A is regarded as text-level markup, the heading would > >terminate the current block element, and the anchor inside it as well. > >IOW, A *can't* contain headers. > > Hmm. I would think that *any* displayed text/heading/image is a > candidate for a hyperlink target or anchor. And since <A> is wrapped Well, that depends on how you see hyperlinks. In my opinion, an anchor links a certain phrase of text to a new document. This phrase can contain an inline image, of course. This explains why A is defined with a content of %text. How exactly would you link a header? If <A HREF="foo"><H1>Hello</H1></A> would be identical to <H1><A HREF="foo">Hello</A></H1>, then why allow the first construct at all? > around non-containers, it should be wrappable around containers (such > as headings) as well. Is there some reason someone decided it shouldn't > be? I'd like to know the reason... Me too, so to speak. :-) Galactus -- To find out more about PGP, send mail with HELP PGP in the SUBJECT line to me. E-mail: galactus@stack.urc.tue.nl - Please PGP encrypt your mail if you can. Finger galactus@turtle.stack.urc.tue.nl for public key (key ID 0x416A1A35). Anonymity and privacy site: <http://www.stack.urc.tue.nl/~galactus/remailers/>
Received on Sunday, 28 July 1996 14:46:44 UTC