- From: Harold A. Driscoll <harold@driscoll.chi.il.us>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jul 1996 23:15:02 +0100
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: www-html@w3.org, dsr@w3.org
At 17:02 10/7/96 -0400, Dan Connolly wrote: >In collaboration with some of our member organizations, Dave >Raggett has collected some of the DTD fragments in various proposals >into a DTD for testing purposes. > >Please see: > >http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/MarkUp/Cougar/HTML.dtd A very impressive piece of work. I do have one question and concern. I notice that the <STRIKE> element is mentioned in a comment in RFC 1866, defined in Wilbur, and replaced with <S> in Cougar. It would seem undesirable to introduce one element in Wilbur, and then change its name in Cougar. If plans are to change it from <STRIKE> to <S>, then in the long run I think it would be better to make it <S> in Wilbur as well. Alternately, keep it as <STRIKE> in Cougar. Personally, I don't think it matters which name is used. I can see minor advantages to each over the other. So it would seem to be an arbitrary decision, best made and not changed, either way. /Harold -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Harold A. Driscoll mailto:harold@driscoll.chi.il.us #include <std/disclaimer> http://homepage.interaccess.com/~driscoll/
Received on Wednesday, 10 July 1996 19:13:59 UTC