- From: Thomas Reardon <thomasre@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Jul 1996 11:15:52 -0700
- To: "'Ka-Ping Yee'" <s-ping@orange.cv.tottori-u.ac.jp>
- Cc: "'Dan Delaney'" <dgdela01@homer.louisville.edu>, "'www-html@w3.org'" <www-html@w3.org>
We'll add to IMG eventually, but not for IE3. Only via OBJECT (which is
a logical replacement for IMG anyway).
>----------
>From: Ka-Ping Yee[SMTP:s-ping@orange.cv.tottori-u.ac.jp]
>Sent: Friday, July 05, 1996 11:12 AM
>To: Thomas Reardon
>Cc: 'Dan Delaney'; 'www-html@w3.org'
>Subject: Re: What about the OBJECT tag?
>
>Thomas Reardon wrote:
>>
>> For IE, also used to insert PNG images when we get around to shipping
>> the PNG ActiveX Control.
>
>PNG support at all is great -- but are there plans to make the
>browser itself understand PNG (in IMG tags, for instance)? I
>think that would be a big step forward. David Siegel would have
>so much free time ("a third of his life") he wouldn't know what
>to do with it...
>
>
>Ping
>
Received on Friday, 5 July 1996 14:15:31 UTC