- From: Brian Davila <davila@radar.cinet.fcr.es>
- Date: Thu, 4 Jul 1996 19:38:03 +0200 (MET DST)
- To: www-html@w3.org
The HTML 3.2 draft dated Tuesday 25-June-96 specifies that _all_ INPUT tags should have the ALIGN attribute set to "top" by default, but the IMG tag defines align as IMPLIED (i.e. no default). In the 2.0 spec, both IMG and INPUT implied the ALIGN tag. Why the differnce? Setting the ALIGN tag to "top" for INPUTs doesn't seem to make sense, especially when it only aplies when TYPE = "IMAGE" and has no significance for other INPUT types. Am I missing the obvious or is this a bug? From the 3.2 spec, the line describing the INPUT align attribute: align (top|middle|bottom|left|right) top -- image alignment -- and now the one describing the IMG attribute: align %IAlign #IMPLIED -- vertical or horizontal alignment -- and the one that describes _both_ attributes from the 2.0 spec: ALIGN (top|middle|bottom) #IMPLIED Brian Davila
Received on Thursday, 4 July 1996 13:35:25 UTC