- From: <S.N.Brodie@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 3 Jul 1996 23:40:04 +0100 (BST)
- To: www-html@w3.org
Walter Ian Kaye wrote: > >[about <img width=50%> > Unfortunately, this doesn't work well for bitmap images (Chris Lilley > has a page which goes into detail about image scaling). We really need > SVF or something like it (hopefully supporting antialiasing), since > vector graphics scale better than bitmap graphics (understatement!). What is SVF? I already enjoy the benefits of antialiasing. The display quality is far superior to that of Netscape or MSIE, or any other (non RISC OS) browser that I have seen. I can only assume that this is due to users not being aware that the quality of displayed text can be so much higher. I can only see two problems with it though: firstly, pages with background images are almost unreadble unless the overriding colour of the background is greyish-white or the author has specified a BGCOLOR[1]; secondly that if & when anti-aliasing is introduced into HTML standards, it'll probably be incompatible with my system :-( Such are the problems of being on a platform not supported by Adobe, Microsoft or Netscape, I suppose. [1] Whilst it is possible to guess the colour, it isn't really that satisfactory. -- Stewart Brodie, Electronics & Computer Science, Southampton University. http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~snb94r/ http://delenn.ecs.soton.ac.uk/
Received on Wednesday, 3 July 1996 18:39:49 UTC