- From: Scott E. Preece <preece@predator.urbana.mcd.mot.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jan 1996 13:31:23 -0600
- To: lazio@spacenet.tn.cornell.edu
- Cc: macarthr@w3.org.bert@w3.org, w3c-tech@w3.org, www-talk@w3.org, www-html@w3.org
From: "T. Joseph W. Lazio" <lazio@spacenet.tn.cornell.edu> | Both &binhex.document; and &uuencoded.document; are defined. Is | there a reason not to have a more general description, like | &encoded.document;? I can see at least one pro and con: ... --- Yes, it would definitely be useful to have a generic &encoded.document, for the reason you cite - there will always be new encodings. On the other hand, it is definitely also useful to have specific icons for common existing encodings. They're not mutually exclusive; we should have both. scott -- scott preece motorola/mcg urbana design center 1101 e. university, urbana, il 61801 phone: 217-384-8589 fax: 217-384-8550 internet mail: preece@urbana.mcd.mot.com
Received on Friday, 12 January 1996 14:31:17 UTC